The Wallstreet Journal, recently published an article on Comic Sans and its creator, which I found interesting as it revealed a little bit more about how it came to be.
I think the idea behind Comic Sans is interesting and appropriate, but factors in its execution have caused it to become a painful presence.
To me it feels half way between an edgy comic book font and a children’s style typeface, making for an uncomfortable balance.
The name Comic Sans indicates it’s appropriate for general use, the ’sans’ makes it much more serious than it ever needed to be. If it was called Comic Book, as originally suggested I don’t think its use would be quite as widespread because the name points to a less conventional and more child-like use, making it seem inappropriate for use in things like business emails or street signs.
Its inclusion in Windows 98 I think was key to its widespread use, as within the standard supplied fonts it was the only softer, handwritten style display typeface. People have misappropriated its use – perhaps they didn’t know what to do with the serif and sans serifs – or just wanted something different and only had one obvious option.